Sunday 20 July 2014

Lady Ann's Folly: Chapter Four - Part Seven



When Hattie got to the dining room, dinner was already underway and the soup had been served. Howard, her father, scowled at her in the doorway and said, “Do try to be on time Harriet. You have precious little else of importance to occupy your mind. If I can manage good timekeeping with all my responsibilities then I don’t see why you shouldn’t be able to.”

Hattie’s face fell and fell even further when she looked to her mother for support.

“Don’t look at me,” said Elizabeth. “You knew it was time for dinner.”

“I was helping Ann upstairs,” replied Hattie sullenly.

“Don’t talk back to your mother girl,” snapped Howard. You aren’t too old for a good thrashing.”

“Anyone would think you were the same age as Felicity and Reggie,” added Elizabeth, but as she looked toward the pair of children her face folded into a frown and she said, “Reggie! Really! Do sit up straight, there’s a good boy.”

“Sorry.”


“He’s playing with one of his toy soldiers underneath the tablecloth,” said Felicity loudly.

“Oh Reggie!” declared Aunt Geraldine. “You’ve been brought up better than that.”

“Put it away Reggie,” said Elizabeth. “Come on now.”

The six year old pouted , putting the toy away in his pocket.

“I’m surprised you don’t have a toy of your own Harriet,” grumbled Howard. “considering the immaturity you’ve shown lately.”

Hattie fumed quietly, taking a sip of her soup then wincing because it was too hot.

Her mother and Aunt Geraldine went on talking about their plans for the church flower display at Easter. Geraldine had particularly grand plans this year and was busily motivating all the great families in the county to contribute.

“I’d be delighted to do what I can,” said Elizabeth. “I adore flowers and it’s only right that we do our part.”

Lord Hurley and Uncle Patrick sat on either side of Howard and the three men discussed business matters, specifically the best way to get the most from the workforce at Blacklake mine.

Hattie had no interest in either matter and that just left the two children to talk to. Felicity was a little sneak, doing her best to nod sagely at her mother’s conversation while little Reggie was obviously playing with his toy soldier again.

Hattie was furious. Her parents were behaving abominably toward her, ever since the debacle with the trial, and it wasn’t even her fault! She was sick of it.

Her mind went back to her sister and the preposterous situation that was enfolding behind the scenes. She thought about what a fool her sister was to use such a powerful item in such a frivolous way.

If she’d been the one to procure the pendant things, would have been very different. She wouldn’t be stupid enough to trade places with a servant!

But that got her to thinking...

What would she do with it, if she had it?

If the enchanted pendant were in her control, what might she use it for?

She looked at the frowning face of her father, talking pompously on about business as if it made him better than the ladies who weren’t allowed to enter that world. He was so self-important; so sure that he was the most important person for leagues around.

And then her mother, chattering on, equally snobbish and superior, always looking down on Hattie because she was the youngest.

She wasn’t sure what she would do with the pendant... long term. But in the short term? She had a simply wonderful idea that she might use it to teach a couple more people a lesson.

A smile crept over her face and she sat quietly, playing out various ideas in her head for some lovely poetic justice.

All she needed now was the pendant...

And so she started to think of ways she could take it in hand.







Are you reading  The Sixth Guest?

17 comments:

  1. Do you think Hattie would make a good Iago in Othello?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because Iago was vengeful. :-)
      Finntasia x

      Delete
    2. Iago believes he has been wronged and that gives him a powerful desire for revenge not just on any one person but on everyone. he is the original behind the scenes villain. the audience knows that he has bad intentions from the beginning but none of the characters do. they trust him when they shouldn't and he betrays them. he never hurts anyone, he never touches anyone. he is a planner. he sets events in motion and gets others to do his bidding. he is the mastermind and the architect of what happens next. In the same way that I suspect Hattie may be near the nexus of what is to come...

      Delete
  2. Ooh don't know my Shakespeare apart from the fact he's a baddie, so just checked him out: ' a most sinister villain; a Machiavellian schemer and manipulator" ... So sounds pretty good for Hattie;?

    ReplyDelete
  3. By the way I like that the Earl and the Countess get names, here, for the first time (I think...) Leads me to thinking they're going to enjoy greater prominence in the plot. Specially that Earl.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hmmm, what would I do if I were Hattie, and I had the pendant? The mind boggles.
    Finntasia x

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. would you use it on yourself or others. perhaps have the earl and the countess switch with their young niece and nephew...

      Delete
    2. I like your thinking John. What fun those kids could have, eh?
      Finntasia x

      Delete
  5. If I was Anne I would make a deal with hattie get me back my body and I will help you with what you want.

    Rob

    ReplyDelete
  6. Man, I hate Shakespeare!

    I haven't seen Othello so I can only nod my head sagely on that one.

    As for the Earl and Countess finally being named. Well... there's going to be a lot more going on inside the big house in this book so it seemed a good idea to get to know them better.

    As always I can't confirm or deny any nefarious schemes I might have but certainly Hattie could get up to all sorts of havoc... if she gets her hands on the pendant.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Good news about getting better acquainted with the Earl and Countess. I thought in LA1 she was a very benevolent character, almost untouchable in a way. It will be interesting to find out if you reveal any 'side' to her in this book.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well she was benevolent to Ann but entirely ruthless to Burt. It would be interesting to, er, get inside her head for a while.

      Delete
    2. bear in mind she doesn't think she is being benevolent to Ann. In both cases what Hattie wanted was control, by turning Burt over to the Earl she made it clear that she was in charge, by preventing Ann from turning back she has established that she is in charge. its all about control

      Delete
    3. I think you're right there about Hattie. She's been under the same constraints for years that drove Ann to swap with Burt in the first place, except worse as she's the youngest.

      I did mean the Countess though.

      Delete
  8. Too true for Hattie but I was meaning the Countess was benevolent... Which I'd thought she was!? Reckon she's got her own bag of tricks to pull out, now. C'mon Emma, love the way the characters grow in your stories :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Countess wasn't really benevolent in LA1. If you look at her scenes, even in the Ann ones there's a veneer of kindness over a sea of disapproval for any departure from good conduct. And she's awful to Burt - really nasty. She doesn't see him as a human being in any way. The Earl is nicer to Burt than she is. At least he talks to Burt. She doesn't want to sully herself with someone so odious and pathetic.

      Delete